Press Release

Ninth Circuit Blocks San Francisco’s Sweetened Beverages Warning Ordinance

Wiley Rein Amicus Brief Helps Persuade Court That Law Burdens Commercial Speech
September 20, 2017

Washington, DC—Wiley Rein LLP helped persuade a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to block a San Francisco ordinance requiring advertisements for sugar-sweetened beverages to include a prescribed “warning” message that disparages the products. In yesterday’s high-profile ruling of American Beverage Association, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, the court agreed with beverage manufacturers and retailers that the ordinance was burdensome and would likely violate commercial speech under the First Amendment. Last fall, Wiley Rein LLP filed an amicus brief on behalf of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in support of the plaintiffs, making a similar argument.

In the Ninth Circuit decision, the panel found that “the warning requirements – a black box warning that overwhelmed other visual elements of the ad – unduly burdened and chilled protected speech.” Specifically, the judges held that “because the required warning was not purely factual and uncontroversial, San Francisco had not established that the plaintiffs’ constitutionally protected interest in not providing the warning was minimal” under a 1985 Supreme Court decision in Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel. The Ninth Circuit ruling overturns a U.S. district court’s decision that denied the plaintiffs’ initial request for a preliminary injunction against the San Francisco ordinance.

Wiley Rein’s amicus brief, submitted to the appellate court in August 2016, supported the view of the beverage and retailer associations, arguing that the First Amendment “does not allow governments to compel businesses to discourage the use of their own lawful products.” The Ninth Circuit panel agreed with this premise, concluding that the district court had abused its own discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. The appellate court reversed and remanded the case back to the lower court. 

Wiley Rein partner Megan L. Brown and firm co-founder Bert W. Rein were authors on the amicus brief filed on behalf of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. To view a news release on the filing, please click here.

The Ninth Circuit decision is being covered widely in the media, including stories in the Associated Press, The Wall Street Journal, and the Los Angeles Times. To view the decision, please click here.

Read Time: 2 min

Contact

Sarah Richmond
Director of Communications
202.719.4423
srichmond@wiley.law 

Jump to top of page

Wiley Rein LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek